And Enrique Lynch strange conclusion that he get?
Wednesday, November 25, 2009
Friday, November 20, 2009
Gay Glory Holes In Columbus Ohio
LITTLE EVIL DIRECTOR THE COUNTRY. ARTICLE ENRIQUE LYNCH.
Mr. Director is disappointing to realize that the opinion pieces have ended up becoming a kind of blogs personal, in which we persist in having things, but we have nothing interesting to say. These small samples of human selfishness, not have the least, if not try to events held in national newspapers as El Pais. Find a forum with articles such as Enrique Lynch "Revenge of gender", which have nothing to contribute on an intellectual level and that evidence of the author, is at best an unfortunate situation.
is normal for an opinion, within the freedom of ideology, politics and expression, generate debate and even to be controversial. This falls within the logical in a democratic society. Otherwise, apart, and that has nothing to do with diversity, is to build a science fiction movie, as it did Henry Lynch, based on a completely personal paranoia and summarized in the famous statement of this film gender "any resemblance to reality is pure coincidence."
Enrique Lynch might excuse for what he says in his article on a song by Shania Twain, that do not understand English well. Or perhaps, he has not heard a reggaeton song as opposed to those of Frank Sinatra or Billie Holliday. But it would be in vain. It would be, because in view of the interpretations "peculiar" by using a diplomatic term, which gives also other concepts expressed in the Castilian language, we must conclude that this person talks about a virtual reality where only he is.
But what actually is this?. Because it starts with an absolute frenzy on the campaign Equality Ministry seeking to raise awareness against domestic violence: Between a man and a woman: zero abuse.
Here the author of the gallery makes a bizarre disquisition on the interpretation that gives the slogan "Of all the men in my life there is none else" and "all women who have been in my life, none will less than me. "From him, draws the following conclusions: inciting adultery, which should have been used in past tense and ultimately enjoin women want to be more than men. Peculiar. Very peculiar. I believe that there to be very clever / a to realize that the slogan is based on the popular imagination and culture where women have come to be less valued. From this social reality, the campaign has been divided into two parts, if you women, the slogan is to explain that never consider you less than a man and if you are a man who never consider a woman less than you. This means that the relations between men and women will be developed in terms of equality. That is the message which were equally to respect each other and that, therefore, we did not believe in rights abuse, nor do we think we have to endure abuse (hence the second part of the slogan: between a man and a woman zero abuse .) Of course the campaign appear in the future tense, not past. Why?. Because what is expected of a campaign, which is the commitment and awareness can not be done in the past, must be met, obviously, in the future.
All this is obvious, as well as the campaign understand that when speaking of "all men have in my life," not only speaks of couples, but in case it did not know if it has fallen account that not necessarily because they are several, must coincide in time. This is not important, but because I see the author clarified very concerned with the issue of adultery.
far you think any normal person, with a level of understanding means.
The second part of the article is already far more illuminating of the problems of interpretation of Henry Lynch.
is very simple. Not so many years in this country, women were regarded as inferior even publicly. You could talk openly about it and to abuse both psychological and physical. It was even socially accepted as normal. Fortunately today although some disparities persist, at least not politically correct to do so. So, there are some out there Enriques Lynch, moved for the rancor that can not publicly express their true thoughts, they begin to make paranoid interpretations of reality, the heat of the fear of their complexes.
These behaviors are typical of what has come to be conceptualized as postmachismo. So, being a male as those of life, but openly admit it, because it is not politically correct in English society. The rest are all historically stale strategies, to try to disguise the discourses of objectivity and matching the machismo practicing feminism. The latter, by the logic functions that are to feminism, liberation theory postulates equality between men and women (not superiority), as aggression. An example of this, we can observe in the argument of the article in question, based on a handful of pop songs, not even properly understood. Specifically, the author seems to care much that there are women who can say goodbye as Julieta Venegas and Shakira when decided. Why? , Because apparently the possibility that women have decision-making today, he interprets it as an attack. So much so, that gets to the point of giving an end to his delusional article that made a kind of apocalyptic threat in the shade as Taliban and rhetorical question, implying that about women who take the audacity to exercise their freedom will fall to violence. For my part, and I warn you not get tired because he will not fill the slightest effect.
nothing else, after reading this pile of nonsense that is the article "Revenge of gender," I have nothing but my sympathy for these resentments and fears that will unleash their personal insecurities regarding the possibility of living in a society equal. It must be terrible to live with that weight. Fortunately, I can also congratulate and commend all women and men who save those fears, make efforts every day to enjoy the richness of living together in equality.
Article that blew
Mr. Director is disappointing to realize that the opinion pieces have ended up becoming a kind of blogs personal, in which we persist in having things, but we have nothing interesting to say. These small samples of human selfishness, not have the least, if not try to events held in national newspapers as El Pais. Find a forum with articles such as Enrique Lynch "Revenge of gender", which have nothing to contribute on an intellectual level and that evidence of the author, is at best an unfortunate situation.
is normal for an opinion, within the freedom of ideology, politics and expression, generate debate and even to be controversial. This falls within the logical in a democratic society. Otherwise, apart, and that has nothing to do with diversity, is to build a science fiction movie, as it did Henry Lynch, based on a completely personal paranoia and summarized in the famous statement of this film gender "any resemblance to reality is pure coincidence."
Enrique Lynch might excuse for what he says in his article on a song by Shania Twain, that do not understand English well. Or perhaps, he has not heard a reggaeton song as opposed to those of Frank Sinatra or Billie Holliday. But it would be in vain. It would be, because in view of the interpretations "peculiar" by using a diplomatic term, which gives also other concepts expressed in the Castilian language, we must conclude that this person talks about a virtual reality where only he is.
But what actually is this?. Because it starts with an absolute frenzy on the campaign Equality Ministry seeking to raise awareness against domestic violence: Between a man and a woman: zero abuse.
Here the author of the gallery makes a bizarre disquisition on the interpretation that gives the slogan "Of all the men in my life there is none else" and "all women who have been in my life, none will less than me. "From him, draws the following conclusions: inciting adultery, which should have been used in past tense and ultimately enjoin women want to be more than men. Peculiar. Very peculiar. I believe that there to be very clever / a to realize that the slogan is based on the popular imagination and culture where women have come to be less valued. From this social reality, the campaign has been divided into two parts, if you women, the slogan is to explain that never consider you less than a man and if you are a man who never consider a woman less than you. This means that the relations between men and women will be developed in terms of equality. That is the message which were equally to respect each other and that, therefore, we did not believe in rights abuse, nor do we think we have to endure abuse (hence the second part of the slogan: between a man and a woman zero abuse .) Of course the campaign appear in the future tense, not past. Why?. Because what is expected of a campaign, which is the commitment and awareness can not be done in the past, must be met, obviously, in the future.
All this is obvious, as well as the campaign understand that when speaking of "all men have in my life," not only speaks of couples, but in case it did not know if it has fallen account that not necessarily because they are several, must coincide in time. This is not important, but because I see the author clarified very concerned with the issue of adultery.
far you think any normal person, with a level of understanding means.
The second part of the article is already far more illuminating of the problems of interpretation of Henry Lynch.
is very simple. Not so many years in this country, women were regarded as inferior even publicly. You could talk openly about it and to abuse both psychological and physical. It was even socially accepted as normal. Fortunately today although some disparities persist, at least not politically correct to do so. So, there are some out there Enriques Lynch, moved for the rancor that can not publicly express their true thoughts, they begin to make paranoid interpretations of reality, the heat of the fear of their complexes.
These behaviors are typical of what has come to be conceptualized as postmachismo. So, being a male as those of life, but openly admit it, because it is not politically correct in English society. The rest are all historically stale strategies, to try to disguise the discourses of objectivity and matching the machismo practicing feminism. The latter, by the logic functions that are to feminism, liberation theory postulates equality between men and women (not superiority), as aggression. An example of this, we can observe in the argument of the article in question, based on a handful of pop songs, not even properly understood. Specifically, the author seems to care much that there are women who can say goodbye as Julieta Venegas and Shakira when decided. Why? , Because apparently the possibility that women have decision-making today, he interprets it as an attack. So much so, that gets to the point of giving an end to his delusional article that made a kind of apocalyptic threat in the shade as Taliban and rhetorical question, implying that about women who take the audacity to exercise their freedom will fall to violence. For my part, and I warn you not get tired because he will not fill the slightest effect.
nothing else, after reading this pile of nonsense that is the article "Revenge of gender," I have nothing but my sympathy for these resentments and fears that will unleash their personal insecurities regarding the possibility of living in a society equal. It must be terrible to live with that weight. Fortunately, I can also congratulate and commend all women and men who save those fears, make efforts every day to enjoy the richness of living together in equality.
Article that blew
Wednesday, November 4, 2009
Can You Buy Alcohol Michigan
NEW YEAR, NEW PROJECT TO KILL THE MESSENGER
Better late than never ... Since the beginning of the year, the apotheosis of great purposes for which gives us, was trying to develop a project to which I invite you to join us then.
Equality Network
Better late than never ... Since the beginning of the year, the apotheosis of great purposes for which gives us, was trying to develop a project to which I invite you to join us then. Since we began our journey in feminist associations, there have been many things that have changed about the new forms of participation of organizations in general and the feminist movement in particular. Internet has brought about through the development of new channels of communication , opportunities for exchange between social movements and society.
Meanwhile, there has been an emerging movement of men who have joined the feminist movement, through their own groups that advocate a new concept of masculinity.
In this context, we too have been evolving . We made our first foray " internautical "in 2006 when we opened our own web space, with the creation of the association blog of Simone de Beauvoir " The Second Sex. " Blog is part of the blogosphere feminist network Women. " This project, which has endured over time, led to the development of a digital newsletter. Today we take a further step in new technologies and begin a new journey: social networking.
The idea of \u200b\u200bthis network stems from the need to exchange documents, reflections, experiences, encouragement and friendship among people who share the claims of the feminist movement.
We can not ignore the implementation of the social network Facebook , so we worked with a system that lets you access your facebook account . Nor does the spirit of 2.0 we request your interaction in the realization of a digital library, respecting always copyright / a.
From these pages, we contributed our bit to build together and all that other possible world with which we have dreamed more than once.
Equality Network
www.redigualdad.com
Invited / you are. Then do not say ...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)