Sea this, the last part of what was to become an entry in two parts and ended up giving to a trilogy.
Either manual communication, there is always the conclusion that the headline should summarize with a single concept representing the text. By this token, the truth is we could have titled this entry in many ways. For example "... and bare the grandmother" or some more, always using the middle term feminist "feminist with forgiveness," but not too feminist "or" feminist trash. " The first two responses by some progressive people already mentioned the involvement of both the President of the PP, and its political spectrum to what happened during the presentation of the PGE and the Minister of Economy. The latter is what a deputy of the PP, Cristina Cifuentes, call us at your blog. About Cristina Cifuentes
I have nothing to say, I did not say in the two previous entries. It would be good to come and lecture us equal those who have never encouraged or claimed.
On both the first two headlines, as we have finally chosen is a collation of the many entries on various blogs of people supposedly liberal or progressive on the subject in question. In one I have to read a classic manual of machismo. The statement that makes a fellow progressive, regarding the response of women in the PP, is that it confirms his theory that women are more sexist than men. Theory is widespread ...
Starting with the premise that this qualification in itself, it is sexist, I would analyze it further.
My analysis starts from the question whether it is possible that a woman is more macho than a man. That is, as it measures the machismo of a person and if it is possible that within this measure, which could have the greatest exponent of misogyny, a woman who was, for example, misogynistic in its most senior, is more misogynistic than a man also out.
I think that some people intentionally and others from the fluidity that gives us the cultural internalization runs through the veins and without enough thought, end up killing the messenger instead of who sent the message.
If you still do not see it clearer, simpler still: it is more operator / to a scab OR a business person that keeps workers in inhumane conditions.
not lose sight of who were and are women (feminists) who achieved the progress that we enjoy today and remember other women who also created the patriarchy. Historical memory we do not fall into such serious allegations as absurd.
From all this, we could say is that, emotionally, it seems more sad that a woman can be sexist, because it does not seem logical, but nothing more. This is not a gender issue, is a human issue and we see clearly in the lack of solidarity between human beings and their fellows.
Moreover, I note the great work they have managed to discredit feminist critics, including some fellow liberals when they talk about a situation of this nature, almost apologizing end, as with the fear that is thought to demand respect and equality was a grievance against someone.
Well, look, I'm not going to apologize I have grown, despite the environment, thinking that I have the same rights as any other human being on the sex or race that is, since I have the same obligations and in some cases. In this conviction I have not killed or attacked anyone, nor have I applied the diminution of the rights of other human beings. I have not even eaten one, well at least literally ...
I have nothing to say, I did not say in the two previous entries. It would be good to come and lecture us equal those who have never encouraged or claimed.
On both the first two headlines, as we have finally chosen is a collation of the many entries on various blogs of people supposedly liberal or progressive on the subject in question. In one I have to read a classic manual of machismo. The statement that makes a fellow progressive, regarding the response of women in the PP, is that it confirms his theory that women are more sexist than men. Theory is widespread ...
Starting with the premise that this qualification in itself, it is sexist, I would analyze it further.
My analysis starts from the question whether it is possible that a woman is more macho than a man. That is, as it measures the machismo of a person and if it is possible that within this measure, which could have the greatest exponent of misogyny, a woman who was, for example, misogynistic in its most senior, is more misogynistic than a man also out.
I think that some people intentionally and others from the fluidity that gives us the cultural internalization runs through the veins and without enough thought, end up killing the messenger instead of who sent the message.
If you still do not see it clearer, simpler still: it is more operator / to a scab OR a business person that keeps workers in inhumane conditions.
not lose sight of who were and are women (feminists) who achieved the progress that we enjoy today and remember other women who also created the patriarchy. Historical memory we do not fall into such serious allegations as absurd.
From all this, we could say is that, emotionally, it seems more sad that a woman can be sexist, because it does not seem logical, but nothing more. This is not a gender issue, is a human issue and we see clearly in the lack of solidarity between human beings and their fellows.
Moreover, I note the great work they have managed to discredit feminist critics, including some fellow liberals when they talk about a situation of this nature, almost apologizing end, as with the fear that is thought to demand respect and equality was a grievance against someone.
Well, look, I'm not going to apologize I have grown, despite the environment, thinking that I have the same rights as any other human being on the sex or race that is, since I have the same obligations and in some cases. In this conviction I have not killed or attacked anyone, nor have I applied the diminution of the rights of other human beings. I have not even eaten one, well at least literally ...
